| Volver a "programa" | Volver a la página anterior |
|
|||||||||||||
|
JOHN STRASBERG EL PROCESO CREATIVO Como resumen se puede decir que a lo largo de su vida,
john Srasberg se ha esforzado en investigar el proceso creativo del actor
y aportar soluciones originales a la formación actoral. Su curriculum artístico puede verse en Internet en: http://www.johnstrasbergstudios.org/es/es.php John Strasberg impartió una clase en el Título
Propio de Teatro y Artes Escénicas, curso 2004-2005. Está
por confirmar si viene o no al curso 2007-2008. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
| John Strasberg con alumnos del Curso 2004-2005 del Título Propio de Teatro y Artes Escénicas | |||||||||||||||
| "All art is
transformational" Thank you for expressing an interest in my work. If you want to know more, read my book Accidentally on Purpose: Reflections on Life, Acting, and the Nine Natural Laws of Creativity, published in the USA by Applause Books. My work, the Organic Creative Process, is based on my perception of the Natural Laws of Creativity. It evolves from where the Method, and other systems, and the great teachers like my father, Lee Strasberg and Stella Adler, left off. This means that the actors' training (or of any artists development) must develop the actors natural, intuitive, Talent, Imagination, Spontaneity, and Intelligence, the world everyone recognized and revered, but that none of them defined. I do. An artist needs all his/her natural capacities developed, while learning to clearly perceive, and become deeply involved in, the imaginary world. Making the invisible world visible, an actor creates and expresses his or her conscious vision of life in his or her art. Because, an artist has something to say about life. I recommend that you see other teachers' work; it will help you understand how different mine is. When I was growing up, my parents taught me that talent always finds a way to be discovered. But, many successful actors and artists in history were not recognized as being talented when they began. And, many commercially successful actors aren't particularly good or talented. Many people, including talented ones, give up, don't work hard enough, are not discovered, never discover themselves, are made to feel incapable and untalented by a teacher who isn't for them (despite how good either or both of them is); Or, are discouraged because what they learn doesn't develop their talent and their intuitive creative process. What basis and criteria do you, or someone else, use to judge your capabilities, and your potential for success? I believe success is achieved through desire and determination. Talent, being good at what you do, is a personal need, a desire and a choice for excellence. There is no professional standard, or rule, that measures or equates material success with artistic success, or a good creative process. "There are three great teachers of acting - "Chaos, doubts, and confusion is normal and signifies the beginning of the creative process"To me, basic technique is knowing yourself, and knowing how to use yourself, so that you can become involved, and focus your imagination, knowledge and experience of life on the characters' world. Developing your presence and becoming deeply involved with the character and the text is the goal. Most acting techniques teach you to use acting methods and exercises. They work, but they teach you to believe that there is a recipe for creating a work of art. They also teach that you are at the service of your technique; rather than that technique serves you, helps you to actualize what you intuitively, and consciously, perceive. I want you to learn real, involved thinking, dreaming and concentration directly on imagining the characters' world, recognizing the human situations, so that you can imagine and actualize the life you want to live. And, I want you thinking like a human being. |
|||||||||||||||